EurIPS 2025 Workshops
The following workshops will take place on Saturday, December 6 and Sunday, December 7 from 8:30 to 17:00, in three different locations in Copenhagen: the University of Copenhagen (KU), the IT University of Copenhagen (ITU), and the Bella Center (BC).
There will be scheduled breaks at 10:30-11:00, 12:30-13:30, and 15:00-15:30.
For the wifi at the University of Copenhagen (KU), please use:
- Network: EurIPS-2025
- Password: copenhagen
Machine Learning for Simulations in Biology and Chemistry
The 1st SIMBIOCHEM Workshop
Visit workshop
Multimodal Representation Learning for Healthcare
Visit workshop
Differentiable Systems and Scientific Machine Learning
Visit workshop
Workshop on Epistemic Intelligence in Machine Learning
Visit workshop
Workshop on the Science of Benchmarking and Evaluating AI
Visit workshop
Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Towards Tight Guarantees
Visit workshop
Metacognition in Generative AI
Visit workshop
Causality for Impact
Practical challenges for real-world applications of causal methods
Visit workshop
Unifying Perspectives on Learning Biases
Visit workshop
-
Workshop Application Open
July 22, 2025 -
Workshop Application Deadline:
August 22, 2025, AoE -
Workshop Acceptance Notification:
September 12, 2025, AoE -
Suggested Submission Date for Workshop Contributions:
October 10, 2025, AoE -
Mandatory Accept/Reject Notification Date:
October 31, 2025, AoE
Workshop Chairs
Jes Frellsen
Technical University of Denmark
Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Yingzhen Li
Imperial College London
Dan Witzner Hansen
IT University of CopenhagenDid you know?
The ELLIS UnConference on December 2nd also features exciting workshops organized by ELLIS!
- Amortized ProbML
- Theory of Explainable Machine Learning
- Energy-Efficient AI: Models, Algorithms, and Hardware for Sustainable Intelligence
- Interactive Learning and Interventional Representations
- LLM Safety and Security
- ML4Molecules
- AI for Earth and Climate Sciences
Reviewers
We received a 52 proposals, which was more than we expected, so we had to move very quickly. In only a few days we recruited 39 highly qualified reviewers who generously agreed to step in on very short notice. 🙏
Despite an extremely tight schedule, the community delivered. The review period lasted less than a week, yet almost all reviews came in on time. For the remaining ones, our emergency reviewers stepped up, ensuring that nearly every proposal had three reviews.
Given the number and high quality of the submissions, the general chairs together with the affinity chairs worked hard behind the scenes to secure additional rooms for workshops. Still, the decisions were tough, since we had more strong proposals than we could accept.
We gratefully acknowledge the following reviewers whose rapid, high-quality efforts made this process possible: